May 2010
Prepared for the Congress of California Seniors
Lewin Contact: Lisa Alecxih
This study estimates the potential State revenue impacts associated with the proposed elimination of the Medi-Cal ADHC program. While the proposed elimination of the Medi-Cal ADHC program would save direct expenses on the program, policymakers should also consider the potential negative impacts of the elimination on cost-shifting to other more expensive care settings, loss of jobs among ADHC employees, reductions in family caregivers’ ability to work, loss of State tax revenue, forfeiting $164 million annually in federal Medicaid matching funds and economic impact on local businesses and other entities that would lose revenue from the elimination of adult day health care providers.
Client Area: Foundations, State and Local Governments
Expertise Area: Aging and Disability
July 2009
Lewin Contact: John Sheils
In this memorandum for The Heritage Foundation, originally published July 17, 2009 and revised July 23, 2009 , we present estimates of the impact of the Act on sources of insurance coverage and provider incomes. We present our results in the following sections:
- Insurance exchanges and the public plan;
- Medicare payment reforms;
- Coverage effects;
- Detailed physician impacts analysis; and
- Detailed hospital impacts analysis.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Health Reform
February 2009
Partnership for America's Economic Success
This study, for the Partnership for America's Economic Success, explores the impacts of a range of parenting education programs and their short- and long-term gains for families and society.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Children, Youth, and Family Policy
February 2009
The Commonwealth Fund
Lewin contact: John Sheils
This document presents the approach used by The Lewin Group to estimate the impact of the Commonwealth Fund’s health reform proposal entitled “Path to a High-Performance Health Care System.” The report describe the provisions of the plan and explains how Lewin simulated the plan’s impact on coverage and costs for households, employers, the federal government and state and local governments. It also presents the methodology used to estimate the cost impacts of a series of system savings initiatives included in the proposal.
The primary analytic tool used in the analysis is The Lewin Group Health Benefits Simulation Model (HBSM). The model is designed to show the impact of major health reform plans on major stakeholder groups. It provides estimates of enrollment and costs under alternative health reform plans that reflect the impact of financial incentives created under the plan. Lewin supplemented the model with separate analysis of the various system savings proposals. For each initiative, the report provides a description of the proposal, a review of the available research and evidence on the options and Lewin's estimates of the program’s impact over five-, ten- and fifteen-year periods.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Health Reform
January 2009
The Commonwealth Fund
Lewin contact: John Sheils
The Commonwealth Fund commissioned The Lewin Group to estimate the cost and coverage impacts for each of the proposals examined in this report.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Health Reform
October 2008
California HealthCare Foundation; The California Endowment
Lewin contact: Lisa Chimento
The California HealthCare Foundation and The California Endowment engaged The Lewin Group to conduct an assessment of One-e-App, an electronic application and enrollment system that allows applicants to apply for multiple public programs through a single application process. The assessment focused on evaluating and demonstrating the benefits of One-e-App both qualitatively and quantitatively. This report presents a summary of the assessment’s background, Lewin’s approach to the analysis, key analytic findings, key implementation considerations, and policy and operational considerations promoting One-e-App’s optimal use.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Medicaid and CHIP
June 2008
The Commonwealth Fund
Lewin contact: John Sheils
This document is a compilation of the technical documentation developed for the Commonwealth Fund analysis of options for reducing health spending growth entitled “Bending the Curve.” In this analysis, we provided cost analyses for 15 alternatives for reducing health care costs. We developed these analyses with the Lewin Group Health Benefits Simulation Model (HBSM) and the best available data. For each of the 15 options, we provide a narrative summary of the proposal, a review of the available research and evidence on the option and our estimates of the program’s impact over five- and ten-year periods.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Health Reform
January 2008
The Commonwealth Fund
In recent years, health system stakeholders have experimented with a wide range of efforts to stimulate quality improvement, often combined with efforts to contain costs.This report explores strategies that public and private purchasers are using to improve care quality, focusing specifically on the role that states play as employers providing health benefits for public employees and retirees. Examples of innovations used by state public employee health plans include: promoting provider adherence to clinical guidelines and best practices, publicly disseminating provider performance information, implementing performance-based incentives, developing coordinated care interventions, and taking part in multi-payer quality collaborations.
Client Area: Foundations
December 2006
United Hospital Fund; The Commonwealth Fund
Lewin contact: John Sheils
For the United Hospital Fund and The Commonwealth Fund, The Lewin Group estimated the cost and coverage impacts of a variety of options to achieve universal health insurance coverage in New York. The Lewin Group analyzed the expansion scenarios using its Health Benefits Simulation Model.
The full report of the project, A Blueprint for Universal Health Insurance Coverage in New York, is available on The Commonwealth Fund's website.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Health Reform
July 2006
California HealthCare Foundation
Lewin contact: Karen Linkins
The California HealthCare Foundation commissioned The Lewin Group to conduct an evaluation of an Ambulatory Care Redesign Collaborative whose objectives included improving patient cycle time, provider productivity and provider and patient satisfaction levels at nine clinic sites affiliated with five public hospital and healthcare systems in California. This report presents the findings of Lewin's external evaluation of this initiative.
Client Area: Foundations
May 2006
Health Council of East Central Florida; Winter Park Health Foundation
Lewin contact: Terry West
The purpose of this report is to provide an objective summary description of Florida's current CON program and review process. It addresses the following questions:
What is Florida's CON program? Why was the CON program established?
When is a CON review necessary?
What is the CON review process and timeline?
What are the perceived benefits and disadvatnages of Florida's CON program?
Client Area: Foundations
April 2006
The California Endowment
Lewin contact: John Sheils
The California Endowment engaged The Lewin Group to provide cost estimates and coverage impacts of four proposals to expand health insurance coverage in California, focusing in particular on the effect that the approaches would have on children. This report provides detailed estimates of the program costs and number of children who would become covered under these proposals, including changes in both public and private coverage.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Health Reform
February 2006
St. John Medical Center Foundation
In July of 2005, The Lewin Group was engaged to develop a strategic plan and unified approach to the coordination and delivery of health care services to the medically indigent population of Tulsa County and the surrounding metropolitan area. The final strategic planning for safety-net services report presented a “road-map” that would in the long-term lead to measurable improvements in health care outcomes for Tulsa residents.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Community Health Needs Assessment
November 2004
United Hospital Fund
Lewin contact: Lisa Chimento
As part of an effort to identify ways to expand and strengthen public health insurance coverage, the United Hospital Fund, with the support of the Altman Foundation, commissioned The Lewin Group to study the process for applying for public health insurance programs in New York City and determine how automation might improve that process.
Results of the analysis show that an automated application process could speed up the current application processing time by over one week and help applicants access medical care sooner by decreasing the transition time between agencies, reducing errors, and limiting duplication of effort. Automation would also save enrollment organizations and their staff one hour or more every day by improving process efficiencies.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Medicaid and CHIP
May 2004
The Rapides Foundation
In 2003, The Rapides Foundation contracted with The Lewin Group to conduct an intensive assessment of the programmatic and financial environment of primary and hospital services for the medically indigent and describe options for an affordable and more effective system of delivery.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Health Reform
May 2004
California HealthCare Foundation
Lewin contact: Lisa Chimento
In the current economic climate, California’s counties struggle with the need to provide health coverage to low-income individuals and families in the face of sharp budget cuts. How can a county ensure that its most vulnerable residents gain access to the appropriate public health insurance program? Three California counties – Alameda, San Mateo, and Santa Clara – have gone beyond state requirements, not only in expanding eligibility for coverage, but also in creating a more seamless process for enrollment in county programs, Medi-Cal, and Healthy Families.
The report, prepared by The Lewin Group, explores the policy, operational, and other considerations of implementing partnerships among county agencies, health plans, and other community stakeholders to change and improve the process for enrolling families into public health care programs.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Medicaid and CHIP
October 2003
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Lewin contact: John Sheils
The Covering America project, made possible by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and directed by the Economic & Social Research Institute (ESRI), promotes serious thinking and debate about comprehensive policies to extend health care coverage to uninsured Americans. In June 2001 the project published a set of 10 comprehensive health coverage proposals. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation commissioned The Lewin Group to analyze the 10 proposals and prepare estimates of the number of people who would be covered by public and private health insurance and the costs of extending coverage.
Appendices to the summary report provide a detailed explanation of the methodology used for the study, and detailed cost and coverage estimates for each proposal. Additional publications prepared for the Covering America project are posted on the ESRI website.
Appendix A: The Health Benefits Simulation Model (HBSM): Uniform Methodology and Assumptions
Appendix B: Reforming the Tax Treatment of Health Care to Achieve Universal Coverage, by Stuart M. Butler
Appendix C: Assessing the Combination of Public Programs and Tax Credits, by Judith Feder, Larry Levitt, Ellen O'Brien, and Diane Rowland
Appendix D: A Private/Public Partnership for National Health Insurance, by Jonathan Gruber
Appendix E: Medicare Plus: Increasing Health Coverage by Expanding Medicare, by Jacob S. Hacker
Appendix F: Expanding Health Insurance Coverage: A New Federal/State Approach, by John F. Holahan, Len M. Nichols, and Linda J. Blumberg
Appendix G: A State-Based Proposal for Achieving Universal Coverage, by Richard Kronick and Thomas Rice
Appendix H: An Adaptive Credit Plan for Covering the Uninsured, by Mark V. Pauly
Appendix I: Near-Universal Coverage Through Health Plan Competition: An Insurance Exchange Approach, by Sara J. Singer, Alan M. Garber, and Alain C. Enthoven
Appendix J: The Medical Security System: A Proposal to Ensure Health Insurance for all Americans, by Alan R. Weil
Appendix K: A Plan for Achieving Universal Health Coverage: Combining the New with the Best of the Past, by Elliot K. Wicks, Jack A. Meyer, and Sharon Silow-Carroll
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Health Reform
June 2003
California HealthCare Foundation
Lewin contact: Lisa Chimento
The Medi-Cal Policy Institute commissioned The Lewin Group to study various ways in which the process for families applying for Medi-Cal, California's Medicaid program, could be simplified. To apply for Medi-Cal, many applicants must provide documentation of their assets and income, which can serve as a barrier to successful completion of the application process.
Through interviews with county eligibility workers, advocates, state staff and others, Lewin developed several alternatives for simplifying both the assets and income tests. For five of these options, Lewin developed estimates of medical costs and administrative savings associated with the implementation of these initiatives. The results of the analyses are summarized in an issue brief, as well as in two detailed reports addressing each of the assets and income options. A technical report on the cost modeling is also included.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Medicaid and CHIP
April 2003
Medi-Cal Policy Institute
The California Working Disabled Medi-Cal Buy-In Program was implemented in April 2000 to enable disabled individuals to participate in the workforce without the threat of losing their Medi-Cal coverage. Although a relatively new program, policymakers and advocates have already begun considering programmatic and policy changes that would build on the existing program, expand eligibility, and broaden access to certain services. This study was initiated to better understand the factors affecting enrollment in CWD and to estimate the enrollment and cost impacts of select programmatic changes. This report shares findings from an enrollee survey, interviews with county eligibility workers, and modeling of data from the Census Bureau and the California Department of Health Services.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Medicaid and CHIP
January 2003
Patient Advocate Foundation
Lewin contact: Clifford Goodman
For the Patient Advocate Foundation (PAF), The Lewin Group tabulated and reported the results of a PAF survey of patient and consumer attitudes regarding two practices being used by some health plans to manage chemotherapy costs, commonly known as "brown bagging" and "mandatory vendor imposition."
Client Area: Foundations
October 2002
The Commonwealth Fund
Lewin contact: John Sheils
The Lewin Group developed an analysis of the cost and coverage impacts of a proposal to expand insurance coverage developed by the Commonwealth Fund. Results from the analysis were featured in a recent article in Health Affairs by Karen Davis and Cathy Schoen of the Commonwealth Fund. The proposal includes an expansion of employer sponsored coverage through a "pay-or-play" program in which employers must either provide coverage to their workers or pay a tax covering their workers under a new public program. The proposal also expands upon the existing Medicaid/SCHIP programs, provides premium subsidies to middle-income people for the purchase of insurance, creates a Medicare buy-in for people over age 60 and permits people to obtain coverage from health plans offered through the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP).
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Health Reform
September 2002
The Commonwealth Fund
This report examines how competitive market dynamics between 1994 and 2000 have affected the financial stability of academic health center (AHC) hospitals and their ability to support their academic and social missions. It looks at the financial challenges facing AHC hospitals and demonstrates that fewer financial resources are currently available to subsidize mission-related activities than at any other time since 1994. Although the analysis focuses on AHC hospitals, the report considers other teaching hospitals as well as other types of hospitals.
Client Area: Foundations
June 2002
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Following successful children's outreach efforts, and now facing rising unemployment and health care costs, the demands on state Medicaid budgets are increasing at the same time that states have less funds available for their share of Medicaid. Governors and state legislatures have identified Medicaid as their leading "budget buster," and are looking for any means possible to control costs. The Bush Administration is permitting benefit cutbacks, while many Governors and members of Congress are seeking to increase federal Medicaid funding in the midst of an already strained federal budget.
Are there effective methods to moderate the underlying health care costs for the Medicaid population? What policy tools are available to provide quality care to Medicaid beneficiaries at a price states and the federal government can afford?
These questions are addressed in the paper, Medicare Budget Options, which was presented at the Ninth Princeton Conference, Can Health Care Spending Be Contained?, June 6-8, 2002.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Medicaid and CHIP
December 2001
Annie E. Casey Foundation
Lewin contact: Mike Fishman
With welfare reform, millions of families with children have shifted from reliance on cash assistance from Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) to reliance on earnings. Increases in programs providing support to low-wage workers and their families have facilitated this shift from welfare to work. Key work support programs include the Earned Income Tax Credit, food stamps, medical insurance under the State Children's Health Insurance Program and Medicaid, and subsidized childcare. By "making work pay," these work support programs have helped families move from welfare to work and have improved family well-being.
This paper presents innovative policy options for improving access to the Food Stamp Program (FSP). It presents background on the current programs and the rationale for why a new approach is needed; suggests principles to serve as a guide in designing a new approach; presents options for making the benefits available under the FSP readily accessible to eligible working families; and discusses where to go from here and lays out first steps.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Income Security
August 2001
Kansas Health Foundation
The manual serves as a guide to the Kansas School Health Inititative database, which was developed using Microsoft Access. The School Health Center database was designed to help track the students enrolled in school health centers and the encounters with those students. In addition, the database produces monthly reports that provide center staff with demographic, socioeconomic, and health characteristics of the population enrolled in and using the school health center.
Client Area: Foundations
June 2001
California HealthCare Foundation
Lewin contact: Lisa Chimento
The California HealthCare Foundation commissioned The Lewin Group to conduct a business case analysis of Health-e-App---an interactive, Web-based enrollment application designed to expedite and simplify the enrollment of children and pregnant women in California's Medi-Cal (Medicaid) and Healthy Families (SCHIP) programs.
Modeled on the state's four-page joint Medi-Cal and Healthy Families mail-in paper application, Health-e-App offers unique features like real-time preliminary program eligibility determination and application tracking that allows community-based enrollment workers to inform inquiring clients of the application's status at different points.
A pilot test of Health-e-App demonstrated that state-of-the-art technology can be applied to improve systems for enrolling low-income individuals in public health insurance programs and to enhance stakeholders' understanding of the entire application process.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Medicaid and CHIP
June 2001
California HealthCare Foundation
Lewin contact: Joel Menges
The study provides details on fee-for-service Medicaid payment rates for 50 common medical services, including office visits, surgeries, and tests. The report contains payment rates for all 50 states and the District of Columbia.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Medicaid and CHIP
October 2000
Annie E. Casey Foundation
This report reviews the disability literature in order to examine the disability community's efforts to help individuals with significant disabilities access and maintain employment; and identify how welfare agencies can learn from and build upon lessons from the disability community. The report highlights strategies for increasing employment among people with disabilities, reviews the use of cash and in-kind supports to increase employment, outlines what is known about transitional services for persons with disabilities, and summarizes the key lessons for the TANF community.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Employment, Training, and Workforce Development
September 2000
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
In January of 2000, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) sponsored the "Health Coverage 2000" conference at which eight major health care organizations and associations introduced proposals to expand health insurance coverage. Some of those proposals were introduced as the next steps toward universal health coverage and two of them would incrementally phase in universal insurance coverage by the middle of this decade. The incremental reform proposals included various expansions of Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Programs (SCHIP), changes in tax subsidies for insurance including modifying the current tax exclusions and/or introducing tax credits for health insurance, and expansion of high-risk pools. Lewin was asked to estimate the cost and coverage impacts of the eight proposals. Assuming full implementation in 2001, Lewin estimated that the incremental reform proposals would cost between $15.4 billion and $59.1 billion and would reduce the number of uninsured by 7.3 million to about 19 million persons. Therefore, the incremental reform proposals would cover no more than about 40 percent of the uninsured. The universal coverage programs would cost between $324 billion and $454 billion per year. The incremental reform proposals specified no new revenue sources to cover the cost of the programs. However, the universal coverage proposals did include new revenues that would cover most if not all of the costs of the programs.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Health Reform
September 2000
Kansas Health Foundation
The purpose of this manual is to provide a performance management system and reporting tools for use by the Kansas School Health Center Initiative. The performance management system consists of five monitoring and measurement components: 1) Student Profiles; 2) Student Utilization Reports; 3) Health Risk Surveillance; 4) Client Satisfaction Monitoring; and 5) Annual Performance Measurement. Used together, the monitoring and measurement components enable program staff to demonstrate accountability to a variety of constituencies and to make evidence-based decisions about administrative, program and service improvements.
Client Area: Foundations
May 2000
The Commonwealth Fund
This report explores six states' experiences with eligibility, outreach, and enrollment as they developed their State Child Health Insurance Program. It explores how the design and administration of state incremental insurance expansions affect access to health insurance coverage and, ultimately, access to all health care services. The study was intended to inform national policy discussion about these publicly financed expansions and to provide early feedback for states as they implement insurance programs for low-income families and individuals.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Medicaid and CHIP
March 2000
Medi-cal Policy Institute
Under the existing Medi-Cal managed care program, enrollees are free to disenroll from their existing health plan at any time – with the disenrollment becoming effective on the first of the upcoming or ensuing month. States have the option, under provisions of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA), to restrict beneficiaries' latitude to voluntarily disenroll from their existing health plan. The Medi-Cal Policy Institute engaged The Lewin Group to evaluate the pros and cons of implementing this feature, known as "lock-in," in California.
The report contains an overview of the BBA provisions; an overview of state experiences and perspectives; data analysis of a lock-in policy for Medi-Cal; and pros and cons, and policy considerations of a lock-in policy for Medi-Cal.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Medicaid and CHIP
January 2000
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
This report is designed to help the executive leadership of safety-net organizations assess the benefits of, and determine whether or not to invest in, care management programs. It also provides a "road map" for the design and implementation of care management programs. The report explains the business environment that supports investments in care management programs for the indigent, chronically ill, uninsured population. Additionally, it draws on the experiences of safety-net providers to help decision-makers assess the value of these programs in their environment. Using results from expert interviews, case studies, site visits, and the successes and challenges of 24 safety-net providers, the how-to guide specifically describes how care management programs are developed and provides a sampling of tools designed by health centers, hospital networks, and health plans to enable others to build on these efforts.
Client Area: Foundations
Expertise Area: Health Reform
January 2000
California Wellness Foundation, Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Sierra Health Foundation
This report is the final report of The Lewin Group's evaluation of the Health Rights Hotline, an independent, privately funded pilot program that provides assistance and information to all health care consumers in the Sacramento, California area. The Hotline is a project of the Center for Health Care Rights, a California-based consumer advocacy organization, and Legal Services of Northern California. The Hotline, and the independent evaluation prepared by The Lewin Group, were both funded by a consortium of California health foundations: The California Wellness Foundation, the Kaiser Family Foundation, and the Sierra Health Foundation. The foundations sponsored the Hotline as a way of testing one approach to helping patients navigate the health care system, and rationalizing the patchwork of resources available to assist consumers. In addition to providing services, the Hotline seeks to model philosophical, practical, and programmatic elements for consideration by other organizations elsewhere in California and the United States.
Client Area: Foundations
Showing 34 item(s)